RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Coming Out Better and Not Bitter

This week’s essay contains some sentiments that are closely related to what I wrote last week. It is stimulated by something the good Dr Phil has taught me. He tells me that when we experience trauma we should make sure we “come out better and not bitter.”

Whilst this is wise advice it is somewhat unfashionable. Conventional wisdom has it that trauma harms us. We are led to believe that experiencing the pain and stress of great hurt has a long term deleterious effect on our lives. And of course sometimes it does. The phenomenon of post traumatic stress disorder is well known. As a consequence those suffering trauma have come to expect that their lives are likely to be impaired.

Unfortunately we don’t hear much about post traumatic growth. And yet I am sure most of my readers will know people who, despite encountering painful disasters in their lives, have continued to thrive as well-functioning human beings.

I am often amused to hear people say something to the effect, “Isn’t old Joe Smith a nice guy – despite all the things that have happened to him!” They don’t stop to think that perhaps he is a nice guy because of all the things that have happened to him. Those that have experienced great travails and have integrated that experience constructively into their lives become more psychologically robust and are better able to prioritise what is really important in their lives. This helps them achieve a greater sense of personal well-being.

In his book “Flourish”, Martin Seligman relates how he had people respond to a questionnaire asking them had they experienced any of the worst things they believed could happen to a person. The list of such experiences contained fifteen atrocities including such things as torture, grave illness, death of a child, imprisonment and so on. To his surprise he found that those who had suffered such an atrocity, on average, had a higher sense of well-being than those who hadn’t. And even more surprisingly if they had experienced more than one of these traumatic events their sense of well-being was even higher.

Friedrich Nietzsche in “Twilight of the Idols” (Die Götzen-Dämmerung) had something to say about this issue. He wrote, “What does not kill me makes me stronger.” And in a general sense this is true.

Amongst evidence in support of this thesis is the paper written by William H. Sledge, MD; Col James A. Boydstun, MC, USAF; and Alton J. Rabe, MS, published in the archives of General Psychiatry in 1980. They sent out a questionnaire to all the airmen who had been imprisoned and tortured by the North Vietnamese in the Vietnam War. Results were analysed to determine long-term consequences of the war imprisonment experience. They hypothesised that individuals experiencing the greatest stress and frustration might believe they gained more psychologically than those less stressed. More than 60% of those imprisoned and tortured confirmed this was the case.

Studies have shown that those who are in poor physical and mental health to begin with are more likely to suffer from PTSD.

Seligman hypothesises that for the more pessimistic and depressed, PTSD becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Most people are now aware of PTSD. As a result when those who are not mentally robust suffer trauma they expect there to be long term consequences. Most everybody suffering trauma suffer distressing side effects but for the majority of people these symptoms eventually pass and they get on with their lives. For the less robust their expectation of long term and disabling symptoms is reinforced and they naturally languish into PTSD. And then often PTSD has become a greater burden than the initial trauma itself.

More robust people experience the distress as a natural consequence of trauma but understand that the distress does not have to endure in the long term and can in fact lead to post traumatic growth. A substantial number of people suffering trauma initially display symptoms of anxiety and depression to the level of those diagnosed with PTSD but they then overcome these symptoms and subsequently grow psychologically.

Now of course I am not trying to trivialize PTSD, but it seems to be that we are striving to find evidence of the harm caused by stress and trauma and it is not therefore surprising that we find something that we call PSTD. And of course it has only been recognised by psychologists as a “disorder” since 1980. It is concerning that, just like that other recently recognised psychological illness attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), it seems far more prevalent in the USA and more latterly Australia than it is, for instance, in European countries. As an example, American soldiers returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan report a 20% incidence of PTSD whilst British soldiers returning from these same theatres of conflict report a mere 4% incidence of PTSD.

One can only wonder what might happen if we could convince people that post traumatic growth is a far more likely outcome than PTSD.

No reasonable person would wish trauma on another human being. But there is so much in our lives that is outside our ability to control and few of us can expect to live a life entirely free of pain and disaster. But if we have no choice over much of what happens to us, we do have choice over how we interpret it. If we can come to understand that out of trauma can come growth and indeed that this is more likely outcome than experiencing PTSD, then we are better placed to follow the advice of the good Dr Phil and “come out better and not bitter!”

Trackback URL



  1. 9 Comment(s)

  2.   By Brian Turnbull on Sep 4, 2011 | Reply

    Hear! hear! Ted.

    My own experiences have caused me to value life and friends more than I otherwise would have.

    My observations tell me that the “victim mentality” pre-exists the trauma, in most cases.

  3.   By Greg Brown on Sep 4, 2011 | Reply

    The human mind is highly susceptible to influence by others. The Aboriginal people could bring death on someone merely by pointing the bone. Voodoo similarly could cause great trauma to someone who believed in its influence. The brains of those so influenced are no different from modern city dwellers today, so it is not surprising that when troops return from a tour of duty and are debriefed and warned about potential PTD and other psychological disorders they start to manifest these problems in greater numbers. This does not mean the problems are not real. Someone who dies as a result of believing they are going to die, still dies.

    I think there was something to be said for the old fashioned British stiff upper lip. If people believed it was proper to be strong and control ones emotions then they were. We are what is expected of us. Perhaps it is time to raise expectations.

  4.   By tedscott on Sep 4, 2011 | Reply

    Great comment Greg as usual.

    And Brian, you are certainly one of those I had in mind that have grown from your adversity – an example to us all!

  5.   By Father Robin on Sep 5, 2011 | Reply

    We ‘come out’ bitter or better from the time we are born.

    It’s up to each of us to chose which path to follow.

  6.   By Father Robin on Sep 5, 2011 | Reply

    My own choice is ‘better’.

  7.   By Matt Smith on Sep 5, 2011 | Reply

    I think the big question is whether or not we have the choice to be better or bitter. If we have choice we must accept responsibility. Hence we are responsible for ourselves. This relates to your (Ted) post last we in regards to victim mentality. Does the victim have a choice?

    It’s too easy to accept depression the remedies that go with it. I concur with both Greg and Brian.

  8.   By Father Robin on Sep 5, 2011 | Reply

    Choice = Responsibility.

    QED.

  9.   By Father Robin on Sep 6, 2011 | Reply

    ‘The buck stops there’ doesn’t work.

  10.   By Father Robin on Sep 12, 2011 | Reply

    And (incidentally) the concept of Timelessness and reincarnation is another oxymoron.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.